Insurers provide clarity on automated vehicles

November 06, 2017
Insurers provide clarity on automated vehicles
Share:

With automated vehicle getting nearer to a practical reality, UK insurers, many of whom operate in Ireland, have set out minimum criteria for a vehicle’s automated systems.


Matthew Avery, director of research at Thatcham Research comments: “It is crucial that that there is a clear definition of what constitutes an automated vehicle. Regulators and insurers require this to classify and insure vehicles appropriately, while consumers need to understand the functionality and capability of the vehicle and their own responsibilities. Consequently, a system that needs the driver to control or monitor the vehicle in any way cannot be classified as automated.”

Ben Howarth, Senior Policy Adviser for Motor and Liability at the Association of British Insurers, said,  “Truly automated vehicles have the potential to drastically reduce road accidents, cut delays and make it easier for people who cannot drive to get around. However, there will inevitably be a transition period from today’s cars to the vehicles of the future, via vehicles which offer gradually increasing levels of autonomy. There is the potential for confusion during this interim stage when people could wrongly think their vehicles can be left alone to manage a journey independently. Insurers want to see manufacturers being absolutely clear about how they describe what their vehicles can do and we think this checklist of ten things which define a truly automated vehicle should be adopted across the industry to help give clarity to consumers.”

The 10 key features and performance criteria required of a truly automated vehicle have been defined as:

1. Naming: clearly describes automated capability

2. Law abiding: complies with traffic laws and the Highway Code

3. Location specific: functionality is limited to specific types of roads or areas via geo-fencing

4. Clear handover: transfer of driving control follows a clear ‘offer and confirm’ process

5. Safe driving: vehicle can manage all reasonably expected situations by itself

6. Unanticipated handover: adequate and appropriate notice must be given if the vehicle needs to unexpectedly hand back driving control

7. Safe stop: vehicle executes an appropriate ‘safe stop’ if unable to continue or the driver does not take back control

8. Emergency intervention: vehicles can avoid or prevent an accident by responding to an emergency

9. Back-up systems: safeguards step in if any systems fail

10. Accident data: record and report what systems were in use at the time of an accident

Matthew Avery says, “These descriptors will shine a light into the potentially dangerous grey area semi-automated vehicles could create. It is also important to shift the focus onto the safe performance of a vehicle’s automated system. We will therefore assess new vehicles against these criteria to determine if a car is assisted or automated and to drive standards in automated performance. This will require a constant dialogue with carmakers as the technology develops.”

UK insurers are also calling for data on automated functionality to be available at an individual vehicle level, identifiable via the Vehicle Identification Number. This would allow an accurate record to be kept of which vehicles are running on older software or are overdue important maintenance. The data must also be capable of being updated dynamically, including ‘over the air’.
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
Australian bodyshops angry over opt out policy
NEXT ARTICLE
HELLA TECH WORLD, provides 24/7 garage support

More from BODYSHOP

GiPA survey paints healthy aftermarket picture

GiPA survey paints healthy aftermarket picture

icon One of the main presenters at...
OSRAM shines a light on its new torch range

OSRAM shines a light on its new torch range

icon Original equipment manufacture...
Bosch extends it’s A/C systems workshop offering

Bosch extends it’s A/C systems workshop offering

icon For over 15 years, Bosch has b...

More from AUTOBIZ